Friday, August 21, 2020

How effective was Khrushchevs religious policy Essay

How successful was Khrushchevs strict strategy - Essay Example x Church that offered help for the war exertion; consequently Stalin â€Å"promised them another arrangement including the arrival of certain places of worship and different establishments, a restricted right of distribution, and the liberating of such strict faculty as had endure the dread of the 1930s and earlier† (Anderson 1994, p. 8). Thus, the quantity of enlisted strict networks expanded significantly after the war and inside no time the impact of the congregation represented an extraordinary danger to the state’s self-governance. It was at this point a full-scale abuse of religion started in the country under the authority of Khrushchev who turned into the undisputed pioneer of the gathering and government after Malenkov resigned in 1959 (Pospielovsky 1998, p. 313). This paper tries to cause a test into the strict strategy of Khrushchev and how far his approaches to have been successful in achieving their objectives. Khrushchev embellishes the spot of an extreme reformer and progressive throughout the entire existence of Soviet Union; in spite of his enemy of strict approaches one can never sabotage his drives to realize a ‘considerable level of advancement in numerous different territories of Soviet life’ and there are numerous who imagine that his ambush on religion originated from a ‘personal pledge to the structure of a socialist society inside the predictable future’ (Anderson 1994, p. 7). For Chumachenko and Roslof (2002, p. 148), Khrushchev was in a way removing himself from chapel issues until the finish of the 1950s and that â€Å"issues of chapel arrangement initially didn't have any fixed spot in his bombastic designs for remaking and adjusting Soviet society†. Notwithstanding, Khrushchev later turned eagerly against the Russian church as he accepted that the vanishing of religion was a fundamental essential for the production of an absolute socialist s ociety. As a leftist, Khrushchev portrayed himself as a skeptic and a supporter of the logical world view; he held that â€Å"education, logical information and the examination

Tuesday, July 14, 2020

The Fear of Winter Driving in the Snow

The Fear of Winter Driving in the Snow Phobias Types Print The Fear of Winter Driving in the Snow Why It Probably Isnt a Phobia By Lisa Fritscher Lisa Fritscher is a freelance writer and editor with a deep interest in phobias and other mental health topics. Learn about our editorial policy Lisa Fritscher Updated on June 28, 2018 Sean Gladwell / Getty Images More in Phobias Types Causes Symptoms and Diagnosis Treatment The fear of winter driving does not have an official phobia name, but it is an incredibly common and, most of the time, rational fear. For some people, the fear of driving in winter weather stems from a larger overall fear of driving. Others are afraid solely of winter driving conditions. A fear and a phobia of winter driving are not the same issues. If you have a phobia, you have an irrational fear, that you may or may not be aware of, that interferes with your ability to function efficiently at home or at work. You also must meet the criteria for diagnosis as outlined by the latest American Psychiatric  Association in the  Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of  Mental  Disorders. Fear of Driving If you are afraid of driving in general, it only makes sense that your phobia might extend to driving in inclement weather. Snow and ice decrease visibility, increase stopping distance  and enhance the chances of being involved in an accident. Many people with driving phobias find that the more challenging a particular drive is, the more fearful they become. Winter Phobias The fear of winter driving may be related to a wide range of other winter phobias. If you are afraid of snow, cold weather, or being trapped, driving in winter may enhance your fears. Some people prefer to take public transportation or ride with friends, while those with more severe fears may refuse to get into a vehicle at all. Unfamiliarity With Winter Conditions Simply being unfamiliar with winter weather conditions can greatly increase your chances for developing a fear of driving in poor weather, even if you do not have other driving or winter-related phobias. If you suddenly move or travel from a warm-weather locale to a place known for its winter storms, the feeling may be overwhelming as you try  to deduce how and when to use snow tires or chains, calculating stopping distances, and learning to steer out of a skid is skills. Even my father, an engineer who grew up in Florida, was befuddled on a Christmas vacation. We left the hotel to discover a thick layer of ice on our car. My dad rubbed his gloved hands on the windshield, but the ice refused to budge. A man handed my father a small blue implement that we had never seen. Dad quickly realized it was an ice scraper, but he had to ask the man which end to use! Fortunately, the roads had been cleared and the temperature was rising, but we would have had little idea what to do if it was actively snowing. Managing the Fear of Winter Driving The fear of winter driving varies widely in severity and the level of impact it has on peoples lives. If your fear is less severe or based primarily on unfamiliarity with winter road conditions, educating yourself about driving methods and carefully planning your route may be enough to alleviate your concerns. More severe fears and phobias, however, may require professional assistance. Fortunately, the fear of winter driving, like all driving phobias, responds well to a variety of treatment options. If your phobia is rooted in another fear, your therapist will develop a treatment plan that addresses all of the surrounding issues as well as the winter driving concerns. With hard work and a bit of help, you can conquer your fear.

Thursday, May 21, 2020

Ehtnic Conflict between Dominican Republic and Haiti Essay

The Dominican Republic and Haiti are two countries that share an island. The difficulties of two ethnicities sharing an island bring forth conflicts that stem from colonial times. Race, economics, politics and stigmas all play a role in ethnic conflict between these won cultures that have very different views on their roots. Prejudice, cultural identity issues and resentment towards Haitians is the reason why Dominican dictator Rafael Trujillo massacred thousands of unarmed Haitians. This is why the two cultures still clash today. The history of the colonization of Americas is one written in blood. The Hispaniola is no exception, and the conflict can still be seen today. In 1492 Christopher Columbus sailed west. In doing so, he†¦show more content†¦When Columbus returned in November 1493 he was surprised to learn that the settlement he had left behind had been destroyed. Some of the 39 men had clashed with the Taino Indians, and were killed. Other crewmembers had become sick, unable to cope with the harsh environment of the Caribbean. As time progressed, small settlements were founded across the island, and the heart of the Spanish conquest in the New World, Hispaniola, began to develop accordingly. In April 1493 a settlement on the northern coast called La Isabela was founded in what is now the province of Puerto Plata, and in 1494 Concepcion de la Vega was founded. On March 13, 1494 Columbus opened the first road in the New World called Paseo de los Hidalgos, and construction of the Fort of Santo T omas began around the Janico River, in what is now Santiago province. In 1496 Bartolome Colon (Bartholomew, Columbus’s brother) settled Nueva Isabela on the eastern side of the Ozama River on the south coast of the island, but in 1498 a hurricane and subsequent earthquakes destroyed the settlement. Soon after the destruction of Nueva Isabela, Bartolome Colon founded the city of Santo Domingo, the capital city of the Dominican Republic, on the western side of the Ozama River, on August 5, 1498. On subsequent voyages, in order to gain more funding for his travels, and under pressure to pay off the creditors who had funded his previous voyages, Columbus introduced a slave system, which can only be described as

Wednesday, May 6, 2020

Use of Technology for Curriculum and Instruction Essay

†Technology should not drive the curriculum; the curriculum should drive the technology,† says Angers (2004). One may ask what does this mean. Simply put, it means that the curriculum should dictate how technology will be used in the classroom. The purpose of this paper is to explain how to infuse technology into the curriculum, and the effect of technology on curriculum design. In order to add technology to the curriculum, technology must be available for use. To be available for use, the technology has to be placed in the classroom by someone – that someone usually being someone from Information Technology (IT). Therefore, collaboration with IT will be required when implementing technology into the curriculum. However, before IT†¦show more content†¦Incorporating technology into the curriculum will also require the aid of the finance department and the board of directors. The finance department will have to approve the funds allocated to incorporating technology. Purchasing computers is not the only expense. Computers have to be repaired, software has to be installed and updated, and additional hardware may be needed in order for the equipment to be fully functional. Newburyport Public Schools (2011) indicated that when setting up their budget, it included the following: teachers and support staff, the actual equipment being integr ated, hardware, software, staff development, technology support, and other contracted services. Once a budget has been set, it all must be approved by the board of directors. Therefore, when developing a technology plan it requires the collaboration of several different departments. Involving other departments in the technology plan is not an option it is a requirement. This author believes that the best way to include other department is to include them in the planning phase. Each department can be represented on the planning committee. If each department is included in the planning, each department can give its department’s prospective on the technology plan. The finance department can explain how much money is available for the project or how additional funds can be raised. A lead teacher will be able to provide prospectiveShow MoreRelatedEffective Implementation of Differentiated Instruction926 Words   |  4 Pagesto Effectively Implement Differentiated Instruction in the Standards-Based Classroom Xavier Anderson EDUC 8011 Fall 2011 Walden University Introduction Most modern day classrooms are structured to operate under the premises that students must demonstrate mastery of specific state mandated standards in order to show academic growth. The purpose of this paper is to explore some effective methods to effectively implement differentiated instruction in the standards based classroom. As aRead MoreThe Role Of Teacher s Is Particularly Complex1729 Words   |  7 Pagesthat instruction is designed to be accessible to all learners in the classroom (Johnson-Harris Mundschenk, 2014). The concept of Universal Design for Learning was originally coined in the field of architecture in the 1970s by Ron Mace, which was driven by the goal of accessibility (Mcguire, Scott Shaw, 2006). Universal Design principles have been adapted for the field of education, drawing on research in neuroscience, Universal Design for Learning is an educational approach to instruction thatRead MorePhilosophy And Its Potential Effects On Decision Making1263 Words   |à ‚  6 Pagesover school curriculum, structure and reform. (Elmore, 1990) Ultimately, choices related to school structure, culture and curriculum are influenced by the philosophy (lens) in which decision-making personnel use to view the world. (Ornstein, et.al, 2015) These decisions affect many components that comprise a school. This paper will discuss examples and impact of the Reconstructionism philosophy on curriculum choices and decision-making in schools. In the context of educational curriculum developmentRead MorePro And Cons Of Technology Essay1287 Words   |  6 PagesIntroduction For the 21-century learner, learning how to navigate technology is essential to success in life. In addition to reading, math, social studies, and science, technology is becoming an important part of curriculum. Integration of technology into already existing curriculum is necessary to maximum instructional time. In addition to preparing learners for technology use in future occupations, technology can enhance a student’s learning especially in reading. With the invention of manyRead MoreLiteracy Core Reading Program Evaluation And Analysis1545 Words   |  7 PagesRich Program Name: Creative Curriculum Publication Date: 5th edition, 2010 Publisher: Learning Strategies, LLC Grade-Level: Pre-Kindergarten Theoretical Foundation â€Å"Creative curriculum uses exploration and discovery, as a way of learning.† (learningstrategies.com) The curriculum is intended to help students become more confident learners, who are not only creative, but also learners who have developed lifelong critical thinking skills. Creative curriculum has 38 research-based objectivesRead MoreDifferent Types Of Curriculum Affects You And Other Students877 Words   |  4 Pages1. The curriculum comprises not only the formal statement of standards, materials, and teacher guides, but also the cocurriculum and the hidden curriculum. For a particular subject such as literacy, mathematics, or science, how have you seen these three types of curriculum affect you and other students? What roles did your teachers play with each type of curriculum? The curriculum teaches students the basics, and the cocuriculum can enhance them or also make students see how they can apply themRead MoreTechnology And The 21st Century1204 Words   |  5 Pagesbuzz sweeping the nation prior to the 21st century. As a result of the television, technology that was used at home slowly begin to be adapted for educational purposes and applied to educational settings. Learners like their Saturday morning cartoons, so why not create educational shows similar to that media that captures a learners attention for hours a day. Sounds great, however when creating educational curriculum many unforeseen issues and challenges arise. Today, we find our classrooms onceRead MoreTechnoloy in the Classroom1551 Words   |  6 Pages The long time use of balances, overhead projectors, busen burners, and document cameras has existed in the classroom for years. Generations have continued to be introduced to these pieces of equipment, but has the technology ever changed? Technology has changed our world, but what about our classrooms? Not so much. The challenge today is to incorporate the 21st century changes into classrooms across the nation (Metz, 2014). Many classrooms see smart phones and electronic devices as a distractionRead MoreThe Mental Models Chapter Of Meaningful Learning With Technology Helped Me Understand The Complex Thinking Involved With Creating Mental973 Words   |  4 Pages The Mental Models chapter in Meaningful Learning with Technology helped me understand the complex thinking involved with creating mental models. John Hattie claims Concept Mapping has a .57 effect size. Any strategy or program above .40 has a positive effect on student learning, making it value-added. I wanted to represent visually where Avon High School is working and then determine, with the cognitive aid of mind mapping, where I could focus my work and the work of our students. I prefer writingRead MoreMultisensory Learning Theory1656 Words   |  7 Pagesstudies and they vary from Constructivists to Multiple Intelligences to Multisensory. As we progress in the world of education, these learning theories are constantly changing in importance depending on the government, expectations and the type of curriculum we are focusing on. One thing we have seen is that over the years we go in a complete circle. Former curricular methods and theories are eventually revisited and put back in the forefront. One of the learning theories that has been visited several

V.S. Naipaul Free Essays

V. S. Naipaul Presentation Reflection One of my contributions to our V. We will write a custom essay sample on V.S. Naipaul or any similar topic only for you Order Now S. Naipaul presentation was the explanation of Naipaul’s past and how it impacted the writing he would later produce. This is significant, as the themes of alienation, deprivation and colonialism found in One Out of Many stem from his early life in Trinidad, his relationships and his travels abroad. Naipaul felt estranged in his native Trinidad, as he abandoned the Hindu beliefs of his ancestors for agnosticism. Additionally, Naipaul found himself frustrated with the economic, political and social characteristics of his homeland. This led him to seek an escape via scholarship to Oxford in 1950. After completing his degree, he took to traveling around the world to gather writing material. Naipaul’s extensive travels have given his work a theme of colonialism, as the wide range of affects the British Empire had on its colonies are often displayed. His lack of a consistent home base is why he frequently writes from an outsider’s perspective. This can be seen very clearly in One Out of Many, as Santosh is cast into a society that drastically contrasts the one he had at home in Bombay. This situation is reminiscent of Naipaul’s departure from Trinidad to England, as there is no doubt that the society he left differed substantially from the one he arrived in. Santosh experiences prejudice and humiliation frequently throughout the story and it is not unlikely that these instances were inspired by similar harassment Naipaul endured on his travels. In addition to explaining Naipaul’s basic background information, I also explored his personal relationships. Our sources revealed that Naipaul has made several controversial statements in the past about a range of topics including female writers, the religion of Islam and the â€Å"Hubshi† or people of African descent. Our sources also indicated that Naipaul has been involved in abusive affairs with women and tends to feel that he is superior to the ones he has married. These views manifested in One Out of Many, as Santosh makes comments that are somewhat racist and sexist. He does not even provide the name of the woman he is romantically involved with, only referring to her as the â€Å"hubshi woman† or maid. Lacking this biographical information, readers would be left to guess what inspired Naipaul’s works and would be deprived of a deeper understanding of One Out of Many. Readers would also be left with a much more negative image of Naipaul, instead of recognizing the cultural differences he is characterized by. How to cite V.S. Naipaul, Papers

Friday, April 24, 2020

The Second Amendment And The Right To Bear Arms Essay Example For Students

The Second Amendment And The Right To Bear Arms Essay WORKS CITED1 Cottrol, Robert, ed. Gun Control and the Constitution: Sources and Explorations on the SecondAmendment. New York: Garland Publishing Inc., 19942 Dowlut, Robert. The Right to Keep and Bear Arms in State Bills of Rights and Judicial Interpretation. SAF 19933 Freedman, Warren. The Privilege to Keep and Bear Arms. Connecticut: Quorum Books, 19894 Hickok, Eugene Jr., ed. The Bill of Rights: Original Meaning and Current Understanding. Virginia: University Press of Virginia, 19915 Kruschke, Earl PHD. Gun Control: A Reference Handbook. California: ABC-CLIO Inc., 19956 Image on the cover page taken from TIME. Photographer unknown. 7 Prune Yard Shopping Center v. Robins, 447 U.S. 74, 81 (1980)8 Zimring, Franklin E., Gun Control. Encyclopedia Encarta: 1993-1997 Microsoft Corporation. Throughout the years there has been an ongoing debate over the Second Amendment and how it should be interpreted. The issue that is being debated is whether our government has the right to regulate guns. The answer of who has which rights lies within how one interprets the Second Amendment. With this being the case, one must also think about what circumstances the Framers were under when this Amendment was written. There are two major sides to this debate, one being the collective side, which feels that the right was given for collective purposes only. This side is in favor of having stricter gun control laws, as they feel that by having stricter laws the number of crimes that are being committed with guns will be reduced and thus save lives. However while gun control laws may decrease criminals access to guns, the same laws restricts gun owning citizens who abide by the law; these citizens make up a great majority of the opposing side of this argument. These people argue that the la w was made with the individual citizens in mind. This group believes that the Amendment should be interpreted to guarantee citizens free access to firearms. One major group that is in strong opposition of stricter gun control laws is the National Rifle Association (NRA). The NRA argues that having stricter gun control laws will only hinder law-abiding citizens. The final outcome on this debate will mainly depend on how this Amendment is going to be interpreted. The Second Amendment of the Bill of Rights states:A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. (Amendment II 1791)This debate has produced two familiar interpretations of the Second Amendment. Advocates of stricter gun control laws have tended to stress that the amendments militia clause guarantees nothing to the individual and that it only protects the states rights to be able to maintain organized military units. These peopl e argue that the Second Amendment was merely used to place the states organized military forces beyond the federal governments power to be able to disarm them. This would guarantee that the states would always have sufficient force at their command to abolish federal restraints on their rights and to resist by arms if necessary. The Second Amendment was written shortly after the colonist had gained their freedom from Britain, and the reason for their gaining independence is that they were tired of living under British rule and especially under the leadership of King George the III. These gun control advocates argue that the Second Amendment grew out of the colonists fear of standing armies and their belief that having militias that were composed of ordinary citizens was the surest way of maintaining their freedom (3). We will write a custom essay on The Second Amendment And The Right To Bear Arms specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now The opposite side of this debate consists of those who claim that the amendment guarantees some sort of individual right to arms. This view comes from the literal wording of the Second Amendment, which states, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. Along with this argument, the NRA and other groups in opposition of gun control argue that the first, fourth, ninth, and tenth amendments are all constructed to refer to the citizens as individuals and not as a collective state. These gun advocates feel that if one is to give a rational interpretation of the collective view to the constitution, then one would have to assume that the Framers referred to the individuals in the first, fourth, and ninth amendments; to the states in the second amendment, and then separated the states and the people in the tenth amendment, although they feel that this was inconsistent with the wording of the second amendment (5). .uc6139b55c5dce4114ac920f04f6e5148 , .uc6139b55c5dce4114ac920f04f6e5148 .postImageUrl , .uc6139b55c5dce4114ac920f04f6e5148 .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .uc6139b55c5dce4114ac920f04f6e5148 , .uc6139b55c5dce4114ac920f04f6e5148:hover , .uc6139b55c5dce4114ac920f04f6e5148:visited , .uc6139b55c5dce4114ac920f04f6e5148:active { border:0!important; } .uc6139b55c5dce4114ac920f04f6e5148 .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .uc6139b55c5dce4114ac920f04f6e5148 { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .uc6139b55c5dce4114ac920f04f6e5148:active , .uc6139b55c5dce4114ac920f04f6e5148:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .uc6139b55c5dce4114ac920f04f6e5148 .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .uc6139b55c5dce4114ac920f04f6e5148 .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .uc6139b55c5dce4114ac920f04f6e5148 .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .uc6139b55c5dce4114ac920f04f6e5148 .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .uc6139b55c5dce4114ac920f04f6e5148:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .uc6139b55c5dce4114ac920f04f6e5148 .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .uc6139b55c5dce4114ac920f04f6e5148 .uc6139b55c5dce4114ac920f04f6e5148-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .uc6139b55c5dce4114ac920f04f6e5148:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: The Boy Who Was Raised As A Dog EssayProponents of strict gun control laws, including Handgun Control Inc., and Coalition to Stop Gun Violence argue that the Second Amendment guarantees a collective right rather than an individual right. When the occasion occurs that Americans find it necessary to band together to defend their rights, they are constitutionally guaranteed the right to own the firearms they need for that purpose. They advocate restrictions on some types of firearms by citing high numbers of gun-related deaths in the United States. These proponents argue that by making stricter gun laws this will in turn reduce the number to crimes that are committed with gun s and would thus save lives. One of their supporting arguments is that each year in the United States, more than 35,000 people are killed by guns, which is a death rate that is much higher than any other nation. Attacks involving a gun are five times more likely to result in a death than in any similar attacks made with a knife. Also, in 1992 guns were the weapons used in approximately two-thirds of the murders of the United States (8). However, while gun control laws may decrease criminals access to guns, those same laws restrict law-abiding citizens. Opponents of gun control laws, including organizations such as the National Rifle Association (NRA), object to the inconvenience these laws may cause to law-abiding gun buyers or owners and would not prevent the possession of guns by criminals. The NRA argues that about half of all United Stated families own at least one gun, and that the most frequent motives for owning a gun is to protect the home, hunting or target shooting, and for collecting. Those who oppose restrictions on gun ownership find support in the language of the Second Amendment and believe that it should be interpreted to guarantee citizens free access to fire arms. The NRA has strenuously lobbied for the passage of state laws allowing citizens to carry concealed weapons. In arguing that the Second Amendment gives citizens the right to bear arm, the NRA argues that the Fourteenth Amendment enforces the Second (3). The Fourteenth Amendment states:No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileg es or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. (From Amendment XIV section 1.1868)In this argument the NRA stresses that no state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States. They feel that this clearly makes it unlawful for the state to pose restrictions on firearms which is a privilege that is given to the citizens of the United States in the Second Amendment. The Second Amendment has not yet been applied to the states, either directly or through incorporation of the Fourteenth Amendment. In the United States v. Cruickshank the United States Supreme Court in 1875 held that the Second Amendment restricts only Congress and the federal government; this was later affirmed by the same court in Presser v Illinois in 1886. Thus, the nature of the Second Amendment does not provide a right that is enforced by the Fourteenth Amendment. The courts view that the Fourteenth Amendment was designed to protect the states against the federal or national government, and not to create a personal right that either the state or federal authorities are bound to respect. Guarantees of individual liberties under federalism have two components: the federal constitution and state constitutions. Dependence should be first placed in the states Bill of Rights, declaration of rights, because the United States Supreme Court has explicitly acknowledged each states sovereign right to adopt in it own Constitution individual liberties more expansive than those conferred by the Federal Constitution.(7). The written content of most states bills of rights provides greater protection of the right to arms than does the Second Amendment. Currently the constitutions of forty-three states guarantee a right to arms. Of the seven states that do not have a c lear constitutional guarantee to arms, three of those have a right to self-defense and one considers the right to life a built-in right. The right to self-defense can only be given force and effect if its guarantee includes the right to own arms for defensive purposes (2). .u5f6ae2f7ac3915182047f7ac4134441e , .u5f6ae2f7ac3915182047f7ac4134441e .postImageUrl , .u5f6ae2f7ac3915182047f7ac4134441e .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .u5f6ae2f7ac3915182047f7ac4134441e , .u5f6ae2f7ac3915182047f7ac4134441e:hover , .u5f6ae2f7ac3915182047f7ac4134441e:visited , .u5f6ae2f7ac3915182047f7ac4134441e:active { border:0!important; } .u5f6ae2f7ac3915182047f7ac4134441e .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .u5f6ae2f7ac3915182047f7ac4134441e { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .u5f6ae2f7ac3915182047f7ac4134441e:active , .u5f6ae2f7ac3915182047f7ac4134441e:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .u5f6ae2f7ac3915182047f7ac4134441e .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .u5f6ae2f7ac3915182047f7ac4134441e .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .u5f6ae2f7ac3915182047f7ac4134441e .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .u5f6ae2f7ac3915182047f7ac4134441e .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .u5f6ae2f7ac3915182047f7ac4134441e:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .u5f6ae2f7ac3915182047f7ac4134441e .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .u5f6ae2f7ac3915182047f7ac4134441e .u5f6ae2f7ac3915182047f7ac4134441e-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .u5f6ae2f7ac3915182047f7ac4134441e:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Civil aircraft manufacturing industry EssayIn addition, state courts consider the right to bear arms to be a civil right and consider such a right to protect liberty and property interest. This has allowed plaintiffs to the use of the Federal Civil Rights Act to sue state officials for violating a state created property or liberty interest to keep and bear arms. The NRAs opposition to the Brady Bill, which is a federal hand gun law that was first proposed in 1985, helped to delay its passage for seven years. Congress finally passed the bill in 1993 and it went into effect in 1994. This law provides a five-day waiting period to allow local law enforcement officials to make sure the purchaser is qualified to own a hang gun. The law also established a $200 federal firearm license fee and a $90 annual license renewal fee. The NRA also unsuccessfully opposed a 1994-crime bill because it included a ban on the importation of semiautomatic assault weapons (8). Currently the constitutionality of the Brady Bill is going to be decided by the Supreme Court this term. The issue being the constitutionality of federal involvement in basically states issues. In 1995 the U.S. Supreme Court declared another gun law, one that banned guns within 1,000 feet of schools, unconstitutional. The States, not Congress, have the authority to enact such criminal laws the Court held. The Brady Bill would appear in the same category. The constitutional issue at stake is the question, do we, or do we not, have the right as individuals to possess firearms. The courts have never struck down a gun control law because many people feel that the Amendment guarantees citizens free access to fire arms. The courts have interpreted the Second Amendment as applying only to militia weapons. The federal government and all U.S. states do have some gun control laws. These laws are based on several strategies: forbidding people who are considered to be unreliable from obtaining any firearms; prohibiting anyone other than the police, the military, and persons with special needs from acquiring high-risk guns; and requiring waiting periods before purchasing a gun or a gun license. The most common strategies are based on preventing unreliable people from obtaining guns, such as people who have committed a felony. Federal and state laws also prohibit minors from purchasing guns. In 1993 the U.S Congress passed the Brady Bill, which wa s named after a former White House press secretary James Brady. Brady and his wife because proponents of gun control after Brady was shot and seriously wounded during the 1981 assassination attempt on President Ronald Reagan (4). As the debate over slavery gradually changed from being constitutional to unconstitutional so will the debate over gun control. The political culture that once supported slavery changed gradually over time once people saw more and more how unequal it was. It is inevitable that overtime, the political culture on gun control will also change, it will only take a few instances to help in the defining moment on deciding the danger of having a world without restrictions on guns. These moments will be seen throughout our nation in the form of examples of gun-related accidents and kids committing Columbine High School like acts. Once these things are taken into consideration only then will our right to bear arms be clearly defined. Currently public opinion seems to be in favor of having tighter gun restrictions as was shown with the passing of the Brady Bill. Though with this majority being in favor of gun control these acts of legislation are rather slow in forming, due to the NRA and the vagueness of the Second Amendment. Another hindering factor is that in spite of the public majority being in favor of stricter gun control, the states are moving in a different direction. The reason behind this action is that the constitutionality of tighter gun control laws is becoming a question. Once the Supreme Court of the United States answers this question on the legality of infringing on the right to bear arms we will know what our exact right is.